A possible future
What if João Cotrim Figueiredo wins?
"The Liberal Leap"
Summary
A Cotrim Figueiredo presidency would be the most economically distinctive outcome, bringing liberal reformism to Portugal's highest office. His dual emphasis on economic liberalism and social progressivism creates unusual coalition possibilities but also contradictions. Success would depend on whether markets actually deliver—investment, jobs, brain drain reversal—or whether liberal presidency becomes associated with inequality and abandonment of social solidarity.
The fundamental question: Can market-oriented reform coexist with Portuguese social expectations, or will liberalism always be a niche position in a country with strong public service traditions?
Election night
January 18, 2026 — The results are announced.
Three Horizons
How this future would unfold over time.
Starting Point
January 2026
How He Won (Improbable Path):
- Center candidates fragmented
- Anti-Ventura vote consolidates around him as "least bad" for both sides
- Reform message appealed to frustrated middle class
- Youth attracted by social liberalism + economic opportunity
- Business and professional class mobilized
- "Future-oriented" positioning against nostalgic populism
Key Assets:
- Clear economic vision
- Social liberalism (LGBTQ+ rights, secularism)
- International liberal network
- Business community support
- Articulate communication
Key Challenges:
- Limited IL party base
- Must work with AD government (overlap but differences)
- Left opposition to economic agenda
- May be seen as "rich people's president"
- Reform requires legislative not presidential power
The Presidency
2026-2030
Phase 1: The Liberal Platform (Months 1-12)
Liberal president uses platform for reform advocacy:
- Inaugural address: "Portugal must be prepared for the future"
- Emphasizes competitiveness, deregulation, digital transformation
- Strong on social liberalism (LGBTQ+ rights, secular state)
- International business promotion tours
- Invites Estonia, Ireland leaders to share reform experiences
- Creates "Presidential Reform Commission" advisory body
Government Dynamics: Natural overlap with AD on economics, but IL would push further than AD's coalition constraints allow. Friendly but pushing.
Phase 2: The Reform Agenda (Months 12-24)
Cotrim uses every presidential tool for reform advocacy:
- Regular "State of the Economy" addresses
- Hosts business and tech sector summits
- Advocates for tax reform, deregulation, labor flexibility
- Promotes brain drain reversal through competitiveness
- But also emphasizes: social liberalism, individual freedoms, secular values
Resistance Points:
- Left attacks "neoliberal" agenda
- Workers fear labor flexibility = precarity
- Social conservatives uncomfortable with social liberalism
- Interior feels overlooked by tech/urban focus
Phase 3: Finding Balance (Months 24-36)
The liberal project meets political reality:
- Some reforms adopted where AD government aligned
- But structural change requires more than presidential advocacy
- Brain drain continues despite rhetoric
- Housing crisis persists (market solutions slow)
- Must balance economic liberalism with social concerns
The Cotrim Paradox:
- Economically wants less government
- But presidentially wants active reform advocacy
- Markets celebrated; workers worried
- Social progressives like identity positions; dislike economics
Phase 4: Assessing Liberalism (Months 36-48)
End of term forces evaluation:
- Did competitiveness improve?
- Did brain drain reverse?
- Did reforms actually happen or just advocacy?
- Is Portugal "prepared for the future"?
Portugal 2030
The possible future
Best Case
- Competitiveness improved
- Tech sector grew
- Some brain drain reversal
- Social liberalism advanced
- IL established as major political force
- Portugal as "Baltic of the Atlantic"
Base Case
- Some market reforms
- Tech sector modest growth
- Brain drain continues
- Social liberalism holding
- IL plateaus as niche party
- Mixed record
Worst Case
- Reforms benefit wealthy only
- Inequality increases
- Workers feel abandoned
- Left-populism grows in response
- Portugal as cautionary tale of liberalism without social cushion
The future is not predetermined — these are three possible trajectories.
Who thrives, who struggles
Who benefits
- Fernando Pinto — Natural constituency
- Patricia Fonseca — Might consider return
- Sofia Rodrigues — Brain drain addressed?
- Mariana Santos — Economics more mixed
- Miguel Andrade — Clear support
Who struggles
- Paula Moreira — Workers' rights
- Manuel Costa — Union perspective
- Helena Fernandes — SNS concerns
- Luis Santos — Social protection
- Fatima Lopes — Cultural concerns
Who would support this candidate
Meet the personas who would lean toward this path.
Fernando Costa Pereira
55 years · Owner of small construction materials supply company
"Finally someone who understands business"
Celestino Manuel Domingos
45 years · IT Systems Administrator (multinational company)
"Merit-based, reformist"
Miguel Soares Teixeira
44 years · IT Project Manager (remote for Dutch company)
"Reform focus; but too market-absolutist"
Nigel Pemberton
68 years · Retired (former bank manager)
"Liberal, reformist, pro-business"
Oksana Petrenko
38 years · Former marketing manager; currently cleaning work + volunteer interpreter
"IL strongly pro-Ukraine, pro-NATO"
Patrícia Alexandra Neves Fonseca
36 years · Senior Data Scientist (pharmaceutical company)
"Reform focus; understands competitiveness problem"
Ricardo Ferreira (primary voice)
43 years · Middle manager at textile export company
"Business-friendly, but seems elitist"
Stories from this future
"A Day in the Life" vignettes that make this scenario tangible.
A Day in Cotrim Figueiredo's Portugal: Fernando Pinto
Fernando Pinto, 56, Small Business Owner
Read storyA Day in Cotrim Figueiredo's Portugal: Paula Moreira
Paula Moreira, 49, Northern Industrial Worker
Read storyDay in the Future: Cotrim Figueiredo's Portugal 2030
Read storyOther possible futures
View all futures"The Portugal of True Portuguese"
André Ventura
"The Workers' Portugal"
António Filipe
"The Social European Project"
António José Seguro
"The Democracy of Care"
Catarina Martins
"The Technocratic Renewal"
Henrique Gouveia e Melo
"The Stable Continuity"
Luís Marques Mendes